Why not?

This is an overview of the very long conversation it would take to answer why I disagree with the current mass rollout of CoViD jabs and, therefore, have chosen not to have it/them myself... 

1. Unnecessary
1. So many already have natural immunity
1. Antibodies already exist in those who have already been exposed to SARS-COV 2
1. At time of writing, still proven to last!
2. 79 studies that affirm Natural Immunity
2. Cross-Immunity exists from SARS-COV 1 and other CoronaViruses
1. Proven by testing
2. Displayed through the large amount of "Asymptomatic Cases", i.e. people who have been exposed to SARS-COV 2 but haven't developed CoViD-19.
2. CoViD is NOT serious enough to warrant mass vaccincation
1. The prevalence of CoViD has been vastly over-reported
1. The full genomic sequence of SARS COV-2  was formed using two very small sections of genome found in the lung fluid of 1 patient displaying CoViD symptoms, and then the rest was filled in using 'computer modelling' using other bat CoronaViruses, 
2. the PCR test was never intended to be a diagnostic tool (too high sensitivity & low specificity), was based on the 'modelled' DNA profile for SARS COV-2 (2.1.1)
3. changing the definition of "Case" to include all positive tests, without the need for clinical presentation or differential diagnostics.
4. increased testing increases the "cases" (we've never tested the healthy for colds or flu before, so we are looking at numbers without any context or reference). 
5. changing number of cycle threshold and reducing number of identifiers to increase the "cases"
6. deaths reported are for any cause as long as positive PCR test was received within 28 days... indications are that 2/3 of reported deaths were not actually "because of" CoViD, and many of the remaining 1/3 would have been with pre-exisitng co-morbidities.
2. Risk level so different for young and/or healthy vs old and/or unhealthy,
1. 0.03% fatality for healthy children, but 0.3% for over 70s and/or co-morbidities
2. Average age of CoViD "deaths" is 83yrs old (normal in UK is 82!)
3. 65yrs+ are 6x more likely to be hospitalised and 15x more likely to die than 18-25 yr olds, and 85+ are 95x more likely to be hospitalised and 600x more likely to die than 18-25 yr olds.
3. Won't stop it completely and will keep needing new "vaccines" if we try to keep up with it,
1. "Viral Load" now shown to be same between vaccinated and unvaccinated, 
2. Now admitted that boosters would be needed every 3-6 months if we tried to keep up. 
3. Boosters are currently still based on wild strain and it would take 6 months to adjust it to a new one, by which time it will have run through the majority of the population. 
4. Effective treatments now known and tested (Ivermectin, etc)
1. Emergency Use Authorisation may have made sense in the beginning when we knew less about CoViD-19 and didn't have any proven options for treatment, however we now know a lot more about the virus, the disease and proven treatments.
5. Forecasts and models of the possible effects have been formed using unrealistic and only 'worst case' scenarios... The UK has always ended up much better than the 'best case' scenario. 
2. Unethical & Immoral
1. Coercion - 
1. messages of fear, i.e. "killing grandma", Long-Covid
1. There is NO evidence, and some suggesting against it, that any young person has caused the death of an older person,
2. "Long Covid" has been around a lot longer than CoViD-19... post viral syndromes are very common and often ignored or misdiagnosed.
3. SPI-B is the UK Gov't panel of Behaviouralists who have been advising how to get the most cooperation from the public, and it's worked!
2. decisions and reporting based on 'worst case scenario', none of which have come to be true,
3. statistics given daily and reported in the way that makes it sound the worst (see 1.2.1), 
4. different restrictions for those vaccinated or mandatory vaccinations for entry,
5. not to mention the various "bribes" that have been used across UK and USA.
2. Uninformed Consent - 
1. people aren't told of the ingredients (see 3.1 and 3.2)
2. side effects are not advised (or investigated), 
3. Emergency Use Authorisation not explained, being rolled out to younger ones even though not fully tested (still in both stages 3 & 4 simutaneously) nor fully approved (pending end of stage 4).
4. people aren't told that there are other options (improving health to prevent serious illness, early treatment to prevent hospitalisation, less deaths in hospital due to better treatments, etc)
5. The definition of Vaccine and Vaccination has had to be changed in order to encompass injections like these!  Vaccines used to "prevent infection", now they only have to "reduce infection"?
3. Feotal Kidney Cells
1. they may be 7th generation, but for many this is considered unethical
3. Unnatural
1. Unnatural Ingredients
1. Chimp Cold, Lipid Nanoparticles, Adenovirus type 26
2. see section 2 here for AstraZeneca
3. see section 2 here for Pfizer BionTech 
2. Genetically Modified Organisms,
1. we stopped eating them, why are we comfortable injecting them?
3. Natural Immunity is better 
1. more effective,  as antibodies are created in the right part of the body
2. Broader protection from natural immunity, instead of targeting just one aspect.
3. last longer as B and T cell memory is created.
4. Current 'vaccines' are still based on the wild strain and known to lose efficacy after 3-6 months, and to be less effective against later strains. 
4. Unsafe
1. Impossible to know immediate safety data because most aren't checking for it, i.e. blood work
1. In a recent study in Canada, up to 60% blood tests carried out on recently vaccinated individuals were found to have elevated D-Dimer levels, indicating that they had experienced minor blood clots somewhere in their body which weren't felt.
2. Although a CoViD death is anyone who dies within 28 days of a positive PCR test, there is no automatic check for someone experiencing a medical issue within 28 days of vaccination to see if it was linked.
2. Impossible to have long-term safety data, as these are first mRNA vaxxes to be rolled out
1. though unsuccessful attempts have been made, including for SARS-COV-1, and never made it to the human testing stage.
2. Lack of Animal Testing, despite disastrous results of animal testing on previous mRNA attempts,
3. Studies already showing that protein doesn't stay at injection site,
1. A biodistribution study from Japan shows spike proteins have been found in organs, including ovaries.
4. Reports of Adverse Reactions.
1. More reports of death following vaccination from CoViD-19 vaccines than from all other vaccines in the VAERS database since it was started combined.
2. Summary of UK Yellow Card Scheme reports can be seen here.
3. Summary of USA VAERS Database reports can be seen here.

Knowing that the risk of me passing it on is not much greater by being vaccinated, and assuming I take other normal precautions like isolating if presenting symptoms, I see this as a personal choice... we each have an individual level of risk of/from CoViD-19...

According to the University of Oxford QRisk Calculator, this is me:

... and we need to weigh that up against the emerging evidence of risk of/from the current vaccinations

I might possibly consider accepting an "inactive virus" CoViD vaccines, but at present there are none being tested or used in the UK.

What I really wish is that there was the option to have positive Titre Test results accepted in place of vaccination... I would very happily pay to have the T-SPOT.COVID test carried out privately if that were the case.

More detail and links to studies and reports can be found in my other posts, all of which were used as a place to keep my notes rather than intended to be a public post, but a very full reporting using the most up to date data from a recent symposium of Doctors and scientists can be heard and seen here (link is for Session 1, then watch sessions 2-4).