The damage of Lockdown exceeded the damage of SARS COV-2

MY ARGUMENT: That the damage of Lockdown has now exceeded the damage of SARS CoV2.

THE REASON BEHIND MY ARGUMENT / QUESTION:

Who is vulnerable from SARS CoV2? We know about the over 60s and those with certain existing medical conditions and I don’t disagree with that. However, I would argue that children in families that can’t afford to feed them are vulnerable during Lockdown, partners and spouses in domestic violence are more vulnerable than usual during Lockdown, those living in the slums and poorer communities of 3rd world and even emerging countries are vulnerable during Lockdown, those with existing ill mental health conditions and now those with new ill mental health conditions are vulnerable during Lockdown, those with small or new businesses that aren’t going to financially survive the restrictions are vulnerable during and after Lockdown, those with illnesses that haven’t been diagnosed or treated during the last 9 months are vulnerable during and after Lockdown, and the next generation who are going to have to pay for the current mounting debt should also be considered here… that adds up to an awful lot of people. I have lost a close family member earlier than would have happened otherwise due to SARS CoV2, and I still feel this way.

BASED ON THESE FACTS / STATISTICS:

Why are we making such a big deal of COVID?

Public Health England declassified SARS-CoV-2 from being a highly contagious infectious disease to a non-HCID on 19 March 2020, because by then they knew it was not as fatal as it was first thought, but this was a few days before the UK lockdown regulations of 26 March 2020 when the whole world was implementing the most draconian pandemic measures ever. A
Current UK death rate is 0.05%... average world wide death rate is 2-3%... other influenza strains in previous years have had higher death rates than this!
It is important that we see statistics on those who died “with” COVID and those who died “from” COVID.
Average UK age of death from COVID is 83. In fact, the number of COVID related deaths in the UK for those under 60 without preexisting conditions, for the entire period of the pandemic is 377… and I would argue that those who have died from COVID having been seemingly healthy, may well have had unknown underlying conditions, but we won't be able to prove they were actually completely "healthy" because no autopsies were conducted on them.
Is Covid-19 a syndrome, a mixed bag of symptoms and signs that has been negligently and politically globally fast-tracked to a scientifically wrong conclusion? Is it, in practice, a conflation of different, distinct disease entities including influenzae, rhinoviruses, pneumoniae and other coronaviruses, not to mention other non-infectious phenomena? We may now never know, due largely to a fast-thinking panic, and incompetent local and global health systems biased by commercial and political interest. A
Covid19 eradicated the common cold and flu in 2020. The official death category is now PIC... pneumonia, influenza and covid. How many of these COVID19 deaths would have (unfortunately, but realistically) taken place anyway this year due to pneumonia or influenza? B
From PHE reports, in England alone, the number of deaths associated with influenza observed through the FluMOMO algorithm was 28,330 in the 2014-15 season, and 26,408 in the 2017-18 season… HOWEVER, this was without randomly testing every patient who died of anything to see if they had traces of influenza... if they had done that and counted anyone testing positive for current or recent influenza then it could well match the numbers we’re using for COVID-19
For those over 55 who are infected with covid-19, the additional risk of dying is slightly more than the “normal” risk of death from all other causes over one year, and less for under 55s. J
We are using a test to “diagnose” COVID-19 that implicitly states in its own information that it should NOT be used as a diagnostic tool. P

Previous examples have shown that the PCR test gives false information. O
All positive tests are being reported as “cases”, but the medical definition of “case” requires evidence of a condition/illness, which is then “confirmed” in a lab… instances where there were no symptoms present should not have been counted as cases, or at least should have been reported separately.
No clear “threshold” has been established for the amount of SARS-COV-2 protein found… it’s like labelling someone with 0.00001% Blood Alcohol Level as “drunk”.
The number of “cycles” being used in the PCR tests is way above the level at which the PCR test is deemed effective… last I saw, UK were using 45 cycles, but the acceptable level is 29 cycles (note: cycles increase the results exponentially).
The PCR test does not fulfill Koch’s postulates. Q

The previous predictions (from British Epidemiologist, Neil Ferguson), whose predictions on which current measures were decided, were not proven true, and again that’s the case...

2001 Foot & Mouth	16,883 - 20,026 IPs	2,026 infected premises (IP) N
2002 BSE	50,000-150,000 deaths	177 deaths
2005 Bird Flu	Up to 200 million deaths	440 (2003-15) deaths
2009 Swine Flue	Up to 65,000 deaths	457 deaths
2020 Covid-19	Close to 510,000 deaths	120,000 (Feb 2021) deaths

Let’s say it’s determined that PCR tests should be used… the % of positive test results at the moment is 0.02% daily and 0.05% cumulative since testing began. Why is this not reported by government and mainstream media alongside the figure for the number of “cases”???

Why do we think we should be able to “cheat” death?

No death is “wanted”, but it is a part of life, especially where older age and existing conditions are factors… while science has enabled us to eradicate some diseases, recover from some injuries and prolong life in general, death is still a part of life and will come to everyone.
“We are the first generation in history to try and “hide” from a virus!”
There WILL be other viruses, so do we plan to Lockdown every time a new one emerges?
Anyone who dies within 28 days of a positive coronavirus test is a coronavirus death. The nominated standard community test for Covid-19 is an unprecedentedly bad one, far from any gold standard test. Potentially up to 93 percent may be false positive… This is not normal clinical medicine, nor public health medicine Where was this year’s flu, respiratory viruses and pneumonia mortality spikes? Perhaps they were parasitically conflated with that will-o-the-wisp SARS-CoV-2? A

Why does everyone have to Lockdown?

A study of almost 10 million people in Wuhan, China, found that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 did not occur at all.
80% of people who get infected don’t pass it onto anyone… (from NHS poster)
There are two arms of the cellular immune response. The immediate, innate system (no specific antibodies required), and the delayed, adaptive immune system (B and T-cells, and specific antibodies required which may or may not persist after the infection). So, no antibodies does not necessarily equate to future risk. 10% of us may raise antibodies in response to the acute infection. We could die in the attempt. 90%t of us might deal with the infection innately, yet have nothing but our healthy, vigorous lives to show for it.
Yes, those who aren't medically vulnerable to COVID19 want to protect those who are, but the ‘unvulnerable’ will produce antibodies by catching and having the disease, so allowing most of the population to carry on as normal could actually have produced the same effect as mass vaccination would, potentially in a shorter amount of time.
Professor Woolhouse, from the University of Edinburgh, told Parliament's Science and Technology Committee that the benefit of a lockdown halves every two weeks - providing the R rate is constant - as they become less useful the longer they are in place.

'You get half the public health benefit of that six month lockdown in the first two weeks,' he said.

'And the next two weeks is only half the benefit again, and then half the benefit again. so the actual public health benefit you're getting from lockdown diminishes overtime if the R number is constant.

'I think that changes your view of how soon you should be trying to get out of lockdown because it becomes ever harder to justify and I think that lesson right now is underlined by a much weaker link between hospital and who is going to end up dying.'

Mark Woolhouse is professor of infectious disease epidemiology in the Usher Institute. His lab takes a quantitative approach to host-pathogen dynamics to inform disease control measures.

Who is vulnerable during Lockdown?

WHO says, “However, these measures can have a profound negative impact on individuals, communities, and societies by bringing social and economic life to a near stop. Such measures disproportionately affect disadvantaged groups, including people in poverty, migrants, internally displaced people and refugees, who most often live in overcrowded and under resourced settings, and depend on daily labour for subsistence.” G
children in families that can’t afford to feed them,
partners and spouses in domestic violence, 6,000+ more incidents in April & May 2020 than April & May 2019 F
those living in the slums and poorer communities of 3rd world and even emerging countries
those with existing ill mental health conditions and now those with new ill mental health conditions
those with small or new businesses that aren’t going to financially survive the restrictions
those with illnesses that haven’t been diagnosed or treated during the last 9 months
the next generation who are going to have to pay for the current mounting debt

What is Lockdown costing us?

The coronavirus pandemic has prompted the deepest recession in the UK for 300 years. To manage this, the government, like many others, has enacted several policies to keep the economy afloat through lockdowns and steep drops in activity. This has come at great cost to the public finances. H
We estimate that announcements made by the government up to mid-September 2020 imply that the cost of Covid to the UK government – in the form of increased public borrowing – will be £317.4 billion in 2020/21 alone. H
INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS ECONOMICS FELLOW JULIAN JESSOP, “A new UK-wide lockdown may cost 10% of GDP, or about £18 billion every month.” I

I don’t think that Long Covid is a new thing…

One thing that's being increasingly reported and publicised is the number of people who had a seemingly mild symptoms when they had COVID and yet they are experiencing "long-term mild" symptoms... this is interesting to me because I have been aware of conditions being 'triggered' by viral infection for some time but aware that the NHS is completely underfunded/resourced to treat these cases (Glandular Fever definitely, but also many cases of CFS/ME/FM could well have been triggered by and started after an acute viral infection).

A = https://thecritic.co.uk/the-covid-physicians-true-coronavirus-timeline/

B = https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/static-reports/mortality-surveillance/excess-mortality-in-england-latest.html

C = https://thecritic.co.uk/boiling-the-bioethical-frog/

D = https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037

E = https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales

F = https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/domesticabuseduringthecoronaviruscovid19pandemicenglandandwales/november2020

G = https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/herd-immunity-lockdowns-and-covid-19

H = https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/cost-of-covid19.pdf

I = https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-lockdown-i/instant-view-england-heads-into-new-covid-lockdown-idUKKBN2992D4

J = https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3259

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7361259/

L = https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03207-w